Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jabari Smith Jr. | 2 | 18 | 75% | +21.6% | low |
| Bilal Coulibaly | 4 | 17 | 41% | -11.8% | medium |
| Jaime Jaquez Jr. | 5 | 11 | 67% | +13.2% | medium |
| Duncan Robinson | 3 | 10 | 25% |
Tristan da Silva’s season line is 9.8 PPG, 3.7 RPG, and 1.5 APG over 24.5 MPG, but his recent role has grown with 13.3 PPG and 30.1 MPG over the last 10. Orlando is on a back-to-back, which adds some volatility, yet teammate absences from Anthony Black, Franz Wagner, and Jalen Suggs should keep him involved. The matchup is less ideal for scoring, as Cleveland’s opponent profile shows a 114.69 defensive rating and 0.159 scoring suppression, but da Silva already posted 23 points in the most recent meeting with Cleveland. His recent production has been stronger than season baseline, though the season average still matters more for projection given the variance.
No specific defender matchup data beyond the listed key defenders. Cleveland’s opponent profile shows a 114.69 defensive rating, pace of 100, and 0.159 scoring suppression, while three suppression is listed at 1.105, which adds some resistance to scoring and perimeter volume.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Evolution | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tristan da Silva▼ | Points | 9.8 | OVER | 64%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 70% | 9.5→9.8 | 18 | ✓ |
Tristan da Silva▼ | Rebounds | 3.7 | OVER | 52%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 60% | 3.5→3.7 | 6 | ✓ |
Tristan da Silva▼ | Assists | 1.5 | OVER | 55%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 60% | 3 | ✓ | |
Tristan da Silva▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | OVER | 58%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 40% | 3 | ✓ | |
Tristan da Silva▼ | Steals | 0.9 | OVER | 54%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 60% | 0.5→0.9 | 0 | ✗ |
Tristan da Silva▼ | Blocks | 0.4 | OVER | 50%MEDIUM | — | 40% | FLIP | 0 | ✗ |
Tristan da Silva▼ | STL+BLK | 1.3 | OVER | 57%MEDIUM | — | 50% | 1.3→1.5 | 0 | ✗ |
Tristan da Silva▼ | Turnovers | 0.8 | OVER | 51%MEDIUM | — | 40% | FLIP | 1 | ✓ |
Tristan da Silva▼ | PRA | 15 | OVER | 50%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 70% | 14.5→15 | 27 | ✓ |
The best case is driven by role: teammate absences and 30.1 MPG over the last 10 support a scoring bump, and he has already shown a 23-point ceiling against Cleveland. The risk is real because Orlando is on a back-to-back and Cleveland’s defense suppresses scoring, so this is more of a measured lean than a strong play.
| medium |
| Simone Fontecchio | 4 | 10 | 58% | +4.9% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dean Wade | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Sam Merrill | 2 | 6 | 5 | 40% | 50% |
| James Harden | 2 | 5 | 3 | 25% | 38% |
| Donovan Mitchell | 4 | 4 | 9 | 36% | 41% |
| Jaylon Tyson | 3 | 4 | 2 | 33% | 33% |
His role has expanded with 30.1 MPG over the last 10 and teammate absences should keep him active. Cleveland’s scoring suppression and the back-to-back lower the ceiling, but 9.8 is still below his recent 13.3 PPG and he has a 23-point game vs this opponent.
The season mean is 3.7 and his last 10 is 4.5, but the last 5 dipped to 2.6. With a relatively moderate line and steady minutes, this is playable, though the recent decline keeps confidence modest.
His season mean is 1.51 and last 10 is 2.4, with recent minutes up to 30.1 MPG. The range is wide, so this is not a strong edge, but the current role supports a slight lean over.
He averages 1.63 made threes on the season and 1.6 over the last 10, with 2.0 fg3m over the last 20. Cleveland’s three suppression is noted, but his volume and recent consistency still point slightly over.
He averages 0.9 steals on the season and 1.3 over the last 10, so the category is live. The variance is high, but the baseline volume is enough to justify a lean over.
He averages 0.4 blocks on the season and 0.5 over the last 10. This is close to a coin flip, so the over is only a slight lean.
His season average is 1.29 stocks and the last 20 is 1.7, with 1.8 over the last 10. That recent defensive production supports an over, though the standard deviation suggests moderate confidence only.
He is at 0.8 turnovers over the last 10 and 0.8 over the last 20, matching a low but stable baseline. This is a narrow projection and not a strong edge.
His season PRA from the provided averages is 15.0, but combo props carry extra variance and his recent line is elevated mainly by minutes. Because PRA props hit below average historically, this stays near neutral.