Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alperen Sengun | 4 | 14 | 79% | +29.2% | medium |
| Dwight Powell | 3 | 13 | 80% | +30.6% | medium |
| Julius Randle | 4 | 11 | 50% | +0.6% | medium |
| Nic Claxton | 2 | 10 | 29% |
Kyle Filipowski is coming in with solid recent form, averaging 13.9 PPG, 8.9 RPG, and 4.2 APG over his last 10 while playing 26.0 MPG, all above his season rates of 10.7, 7.0, and 2.4. The biggest swing factor is Isaiah Collier being out, which removes 7.2 APG and 11.7 PPG from the rotation and supports Filipowski’s ball-handling and usage. Toronto’s defense numbers are not an obvious scoring-friendly spot, and with Utah at home his scoring profile is still more in the mid-teens than a true ceiling game. The market also shows stronger value on the under side for points and rebound-heavy combos than on the over, especially given his season baseline versus the recent spike.
Toronto’s defense profile shows a 112.09 defensive rating, 100 pace, and negative scoring suppression of -0.735, with no specific defender matchup data. That makes this more of a neutral-to-slightly-tough environment for an over on points, especially compared with his recent hot stretch.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kyle Filipowski▼ | Points | 13.5 | UNDER | 71%HIGH | 2/2 | 40% | 6 | ✓ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | Rebounds | 8.5 | UNDER | 62%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 60% | 8 | ✓ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | Assists | 2.5 | OVER | 60%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 90% | 4 | ✓ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | UNDER | 68%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | OVER | 64%MEDIUM | — | 70% | 2 | ✓ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | P+R | 22.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 50% | 14 | ✓ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | PRA | 25.5 | UNDER | 57%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 18 | ✓ |
The best available value data points to the under with a 0.07 edge and a 0.579 projected probability on the 13.5 line. His season scoring average is 10.7 PPG, and while recent numbers are higher, that recent surge is enough above baseline to invite regression rather than justify the over.
| low |
| Nikola Vučević | 2 | 9 | 72% | +19.4% | low |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandro Mamukelashvili | 2 | 6 | 7 | 60% | 70% |
| Jamison Battle | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Scottie Barnes | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% |
| Collin Murray-Boyles | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Gradey Dick | 2 | 1 | 2 | 100% | 100% |
Season average is 10.7 PPG versus a 13.5 line, and the provided value data shows the UNDER as the best side with a 0.07 edge and 0.579 projected under probability. His last-10 scoring is higher at 13.9, but that sits above his season level and is a spot to be cautious about regression.
He averages 7.0 RPG on the season and 6.96 in the prop metrics, below the 8.5 line. Recent rebounding has improved to 8.9 over the last 10, but the model flags only modest value and the over would be leaning on the hotter stretch.
Collier’s absence removes 7.2 APG from the roster, and Filipowski’s recent assist form is strong at 4.2 over the last 10 and 3.8 over the last 5. The season mean is only 2.43, so the over is more role-driven than season-driven.
He averages 0.9 made threes per game on the season and 1.2 over the last 10, but the 1.5 line still sits above his baseline volume. The value data also shows the under as the better side at multiple books.
His season stocks are 1.49 and rise to 2.1 over the last 10, with 1.6 over the last 5. That makes 1.5 a fair projected line, and the recent defensive event rate supports a slight over lean.
His season P+R profile is 17.66 on the provided means, while the market line is 22.5. Recent form is better, but combo props carry extra variance and the season baseline still points under.
Using the season means, his PRA is 15.53, well below 25.5, even though recent usage has improved. This is a volatile combo and the under aligns with the conservative approach on elevated lines.