Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivica Zubac | 3 | 14 | 62% | -14.1% | medium |
| Oso Ighodaro | 4 | 13 | 33% | -42.3% | medium |
| Jusuf Nurkić | 3 | 13 | 79% | -4.2% | medium |
| Jay Huff | 2 | 12 | 85% |
Jaxson Hayes has been trending up in minutes and production, with a season line of 6.8 PPG, 4.0 RPG, and 0.9 APG, while his last 10 sits slightly higher at 7.2 PPG and 4.1 RPG. The most recent game logs show some volatility in scoring, but his defensive activity has been strong lately with 2.6 stocks in the last 5 and 1.8 in the last 10. Against Indiana, his prior meeting was solid at 9 points, 4 rebounds, and 2 assists in 25 minutes, but the current market still prices his scoring above his season baseline. The better angle is the rebound under, since his role suggests a modest floor but not enough volume to consistently clear an elevated board.
No specific defender matchup data is available. The opponent context does show Indiana allowing a 120.51 defensive rating with a 100 pace, and Hayes has already played this opponent once this season with 9 points, 4 rebounds, and 2 assists in 25 minutes.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jaxson Hayes▼ | Points | 9.5 | UNDER | 66%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 80% | 21 | ✗ |
Jaxson Hayes▼ | Rebounds | 5.5 | UNDER | 82%HIGH | 1/2 | 80% | 10 | ✗ |
Jaxson Hayes▼ | Assists | 0.5 | OVER | 61%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 60% | 1 | ✓ |
Jaxson Hayes▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | OVER | 64%MEDIUM | — | 50% | 2 | ✓ |
Jaxson Hayes▼ | Steals | 0.5 | UNDER | 70%HIGH | — | 50% | 2 | ✗ |
Jaxson Hayes▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | OVER | 58%MEDIUM | — | 40% | 4 | ✓ |
Jaxson Hayes▼ | P+R | 10.5 | UNDER | 67%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 40% | 31 | ✗ |
Jaxson Hayes▼ | P+A | 6.5 | UNDER | 65%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 40% | 22 | ✗ |
This is the clearest statistical edge in the file: Hayes averages 4.0 rebounds for the season and 4.1 over the last 10, both well below 5.5. The value board also backs the under strongly, with a 27.8% edge and 59.57 EV per 100 at DraftKings.
| low |
| Daniel Gafford | 3 | 10 | 100% | +24.4% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Huff | 2 | 12 | 17 | 70% | 85% |
| Andrew Nembhard | 2 | 3 | 7 | 50% | 63% |
| Pascal Siakam | 2 | 2 | 3 | 100% | 100% |
| Micah Potter | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Aaron Nesmith | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
His season mean is 6.81 points and his last 10 is 7.2, both below 9.5. Recent scoring has also been inconsistent, and the value data shows the best side at UNDER on every listed 9.5 points market.
His season mean is exactly 4.0 rebounds and his last 10 is 4.1, well below 5.5. Value data strongly supports UNDER with a 27.8% edge and 59.57 EV per 100 at DraftKings.
He averages 0.9 assists per game this season and 0.8 over the last 10, so 0.5 is a low bar. The volatility is high, but the raw average still favors at least one assist more often than not.
He averages 0.7 blocks on the season and 1.2 over the last 10, with a 2.0-block last 5. The recent defensive spike makes 0.5 a reachable threshold despite normal variance.
He averages just 0.4 steals on the season and 0.6 over the last 10, so the under is still slightly safer on a 0.5 line. Recent defensive pop is better captured by blocks than steals.
His season stocks average is 1.14, but the last 10 is 1.8 and the last 5 is 2.6, showing real defensive upside. The combo is volatile, though, so confidence stays modest.
His season points plus rebounds profile is 10.8 using 6.8 PPG and 4.0 RPG, with recent form not enough to justify a stronger over lean. Combo props are higher variance, so the under is preferred unless the role expands.
He averages only 0.9 assists, so points plus assists is heavily dependent on scoring volume. With points projected below market and assists still modest, the under holds the cleaner edge.