Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alperen Sengun | 2 | 11 | 76% | +22.5% | low |
| Brook Lopez | 4 | 10 | 60% | +8.8% | medium |
| Evan Mobley | 1 | 9 | 63% | +11.3% | low |
| Robert Williams III | 2 | 8 | 83% |
Richards is trending up, with his last 5 games at 9.2 PPG and 7.2 RPG compared to season marks of 6.0 PPG and 5.2 RPG, but that lift has already been priced into a bigger minutes role. His recent workload has jumped to 23.0 MPG from a 15.1 MPG season average, yet his season-long production still points to a lower baseline than his recent stretch. The matchup data is not especially favorable for efficiency, and the available value props lean to the under on points and rebounds. With his volatility still elevated, the safer projection is a modest line below his recent hot run.
No specific defender matchup data is provided in a way that justifies a one-on-one call. The opponent defense context shows a 116.15 defensive rating and 0.164 scoring suppression, which is not ideal for an efficiency-driven over.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nick Richards▼ | Points | 9.5 | UNDER | 74%HIGH | 30% | 2 | ✓ |
Nick Richards▼ | Rebounds | 7.5 | UNDER | 63%MEDIUM | 30% | 5 | ✓ |
Nick Richards▼ | Assists | 0.5 | UNDER | 82%HIGH | 40% | 0 | ✓ |
Nick Richards▼ | 3PM | 0.5 | UNDER | 78%HIGH | 70% | 0 | ✓ |
Nick Richards▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | OVER | 58%MEDIUM | 50% | 0 | ✗ |
Nick Richards▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | UNDER | 60%MEDIUM | 70% | 0 | ✓ |
Nick Richards▼ | Turnovers | 1.5 | UNDER | 67%MEDIUM | 50% | 2 | ✗ |
Nick Richards▼ | PRA | 15 | UNDER | 56%MEDIUM | 20% | 7 | ✓ |
This is the clearest value on the board: the best book data shows a 0.197 edge with 0.743 implied probability on the under. Richards’ season scoring is only 6.0 PPG, so even with the recent boost in minutes and form, the 9.5 line still sits above his most stable baseline.
| low |
| Nikola Jokić | 3 | 8 | 100% | +28.8% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adem Bona | 1 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% |
| Joel Embiid | 1 | 1 | 6 | 100% | 100% |
| Dominick Barlow | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| VJ Edgecombe | 1 | 0 | 2 | 100% | 100% |
| Quentin Grimes | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
Season scoring is 6.0 PPG, well below the 9.5 line, and the value data shows the best side is UNDER with a 0.197 edge. His last 5 at 9.2 PPG is solid, but it is still only slightly below the number and comes with regression risk after the recent minutes spike.
His season mean is 5.2 RPG versus a 7.5 line, and the strongest book-side data also points UNDER with a 0.056 edge. Recent rebounding is up at 7.2 RPG over the last 5, but the season baseline is still meaningfully lower.
He averages only 0.3 APG on the season and 0.4 APG over the last 5, so assist production remains extremely limited. With no meaningful passing volume, the under is the clear side.
He averages 0.11 threes per game for the season and 0.3 over the last 5, which is still below a standard half-made-three line. His low-volume perimeter role keeps this under attractive.
He averages 0.7 BPG on the season and 0.8 over the last 5, so a half-block line is within reach. The recent increase in minutes supports a modest over lean, though variance remains notable.
His season stocks average is 0.93 and his last 10 is 1.1, both below 1.5. Even with recent defensive activity, the combined threshold is still a bit high.
He averages 1.5 turnovers over the last 10 and 1.6 over the last 20, but only 0.8 in the last 5. With limited on-ball creation, he is not a high-turnover player overall.
Using his season baseline of 6.0 points, 5.2 rebounds, and 0.3 assists gives 11.5 PRA, well below a 15.0 line. Recent production has improved, but combo props carry extra variance and the season profile still favors the under.