Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaylen Brown | 4 | 19 | 63% | +10.4% | medium |
| Jalen Johnson | 4 | 12 | 53% | +10.4% | medium |
| Paolo Banchero | 2 | 9 | 100% | +60.4% | low |
| Naji Marshall | 3 | 9 | 100% |
Noah Clowney’s season scoring average is 12.5 PPG, but his last 5 have dropped to 7.4 PPG with minutes falling to 17.0, well below his season 27.4 MPG. His last 10 and last 20 point averages of 10.2 and 11.2 also sit below the season number, which supports a cooler current form. This matchup comes against a Trail Blazers defense with a 117.34 defensive rating and a 0.455 scoring suppression mark, but the biggest issue is Clowney’s reduced recent usage and minute load on a back-to-back. With no teammate or opponent absence boost shown, the safer angle is to lean under on his higher-volume props and keep confidence modest.
No specific defender matchup data beyond the listed key defenders, and the game context does not provide a clear one-on-one assignment. Portland’s team defense shows a 117.34 defensive rating with 0.455 scoring suppression, which supports a more cautious scoring outlook.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noah Clowney▼ | Points | 12.5 | UNDER | 69%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 70% |
Noah Clowney▼ | Rebounds | 4.5 | UNDER | 63%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 70% |
Noah Clowney▼ | Assists | 1.5 | OVER | 54%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 40% |
Noah Clowney▼ | 3PM | 2 | UNDER | 66%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 90% |
Noah Clowney▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | — | 70% |
Noah Clowney▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | UNDER | 60%MEDIUM | — | 80% |
Noah Clowney▼ | Turnovers | 1.5 | OVER | 56%MEDIUM | — | 20% |
Noah Clowney▼ | P+A | 11.5 | UNDER | 65%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% |
Noah Clowney▼ | P+R | 14.5 | UNDER | 64%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 60% |
Noah Clowney▼ | R+A | 4.5 | UNDER | 62%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 30% |
His season average is 12.5, but the last 5 have fallen to 7.4 and his recent minutes are down to 17.0 from 27.4 season-long. With a back-to-back context and no injury-driven usage boost in the data, the under is the strongest angle.
| medium |
| Brandon Ingram | 3 | 8 | 42% | -1.1% | medium |
His season mean is 12.5, but the last 5 are just 7.4 and the last 10 are 10.2, while recent minutes are only 17.0 versus 27.4 season-long. That combination points to a lower scoring expectation than the season average.
He averages 4.1 rebounds on the season and 3.6 over the last 5, with away and home splits both staying below 5.0. The recent playing-time drop makes it harder to clear a mid-4s rebound line.
His season mean is 1.68 and the last 10 are 1.5, so this is close to a fair line rather than a strong edge. The spread in assist production is moderate, so confidence stays limited.
He averages 2.02 threes per game, but the last 5 are down to 1.0 and the last 10 are 1.5. With recent minutes and attempts both falling, the under is slightly preferred.
He averages 0.7 blocks on the season, but the last 5 are only 0.2 and the last 10 are 0.3. Because his recent block rate has cooled, the 0.5 line is playable on the under despite the low threshold.
His season stocks average is 1.4 and the last 5 are 0.8, with recent form clearly below season baseline. The combination of lower steals and blocks makes clearing 1.5 less likely.
He is at 2.0+ meaningful turnover territory based on a 1.1 season average and 1.2 over the last 5, but recent logs include multiple 1-3 turnover games. The recent usage is lower, so this is only a slight lean if a 1.5 line is posted.
His season points plus assists profile is 14.2, but recent minutes and scoring are down, with the last 5 at 8.6 combined points and assists. On a back-to-back, the under is safer than trusting season output.
His season points plus rebounds average is 16.6, but last 5 production is only 11.0 and last 10 is 14.1. With current minutes at 17.0 in the last 5, he is not projecting like a clear over candidate.
He averages 5.8 rebounds plus assists on the season, but the last 5 are only 4.8 and the last 10 are 5.4. That puts the 4.5 line close, but the recent minute drop favors the under.