Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noah Clowney | 3 | 19 | 54% | -0.9% | medium |
| Gary Trent Jr. | 4 | 17 | 45% | -17.1% | medium |
| Zaccharie Risacher | 4 | 16 | 44% | -9.6% | medium |
| Tobias Harris | 3 | 16 | 83% |
Brandon Ingram is averaging 21.8 PPG, 5.6 RPG, and 3.7 APG on the season, but his recent scoring has been volatile with 25.8 PPG over the last 5 and a much steadier 21.8 PPG over the last 10. Against Phoenix, he has averaged 23.375 PPG, 5.5 RPG, and 5.5 APG across 8 games, which supports his overall involvement. The matchup also points to some scoring resistance, with Phoenix carrying a 111.17 defensive rating and a -1.55 three suppression mark, so the best edges are tied more to volume and role than explosive scoring upside.
Key defender data is limited and not enough to build a specific defender read, so there is no specific defender matchup data. Phoenix’s team defense numbers are the main signal here, with a 111.17 defensive rating and -1.55 three suppression suggesting a tougher scoring environment from deep.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brandon Ingram▼ | Points | 21.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 6 | ✓ |
Brandon Ingram▼ | Rebounds | 5.5 | UNDER | 60%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 70% | 4 | ✓ |
Brandon Ingram▼ | Assists | 3.5 | OVER | 64%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 50% | 1 | ✗ |
Brandon Ingram▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | OVER | 63%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 40% | 0 | ✗ |
Brandon Ingram▼ | Steals | 0.5 | OVER | 52%MEDIUM | — | 60% | 0 | ✗ |
Brandon Ingram▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | UNDER | 56%MEDIUM | — | 70% | 3 | ✗ |
Brandon Ingram▼ | P+A | 25.5 | OVER | 55%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 7 | ✗ |
Brandon Ingram▼ | P+R | 26.5 | OVER | 54%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 10 | ✗ |
Brandon Ingram▼ | Double-Double | 0 | UNDER | 72%HIGH | — | — | — | — |
This is the cleanest value on the board because his season average is 3.73 APG, his vs-opponent average is 5.5 APG in 8 games, and the value file shows a 0.087 edge with positive EV. Unlike the scoring props, this bet is supported by both role-based production and explicit market edge.
| medium |
| Mikal Bridges | 4 | 16 | 50% | -1.6% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royce O'Neale | 1 | 5 | 3 | 25% | 38% |
| Haywood Highsmith | 1 | 4 | 2 | 100% | 100% |
| Rasheer Fleming | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Ryan Dunn | 1 | 3 | 5 | 100% | 125% |
| Jordan Goodwin | 2 | 3 | 7 | 50% | 75% |
His season mean is 21.8, but his last-10 is also 21.8 and Phoenix has a 111.17 defensive rating with -1.55 three suppression. With the OVER bias caution and his recent scoring variance, the under is the steadier lean.
He is at 5.6 RPG for the season, but only 4.6 over the last 10 and 4.8 over the last 5. That recent dip makes 5.5 a slightly inflated number relative to his current form.
His season assist average is 3.73 and his vs-opponent mark is 5.5 APG across 8 games, with a 4.0 b2b mean in the data. The best value file also shows a 0.087 edge on Over 3.5 assists.
He averages 1.81 made threes per game on the season and 1.8 over the last 10, with 2.0 at home. Value data shows a 0.074 edge on the DraftKings Over 1.5.
He averages 0.8 steals per game on the season and 0.9 over the last 10, so a 0.5 line is reachable. Confidence stays modest because the recent standard deviation is high at 1.17 for stocks-related production.
He averages 0.7 blocks per game on the season, but only 0.3 over the last 10 and 0.0 over the last 5. That recent drop supports the under at a 0.5 line.
Points plus assists is supported by his 21.8 PPG and 3.7 APG season averages, and his matchup history vs Phoenix includes 23.375 PPG and 5.5 APG. This is a combo prop, so confidence is moderate only.
His season points and rebounds combine to 27.4, which sits slightly above the 26.5 line. The recent rebound dip keeps this from being a high-confidence play.
He has no strong double-double profile from the provided season averages, with 21.8 PPG but only 5.6 RPG and 3.7 APG. The recent rebound and assist trends are both below season levels, which lowers DD upside.